Academic/Image

Title: “The Cycle of Learning, In, From, and for Practice”

Summary: Image depicts the ideal learning process for a teacher as defined by a research project (LTP)carried out by UCLA, University of Michigan, and University of Washington. Learning in, from and for teaching practice (LTP) is experimenting with the idea that students best learn how to become teachers not by studying textbooks and taking tests, but by acting as teacher, observing teachers and practicing. This cyclical model shows the comprehension steps that transfer a teacher-classroom experience into an educational practice for the teacher-in-training.

Topic: Accrediting all schools of education

Category: Academic/Image

What is it? An image of the LTP’s new learning cycle

Publication Information: University of Michigan, 2007

Author: None Listed

Location: http://sitemaker.umich.edu/ltp/home

Accessed: Mar.15, 2009

Support:

Although the image only shows a few steps that represent the LTP research project, three universities are behind that project and its model, as well as teacher educators who are experimenting with putting the model into practice, and Pam Grossman, whose research has helped to shape the concept of LTP.

Audience and Agenda: Currently, this research project has not published or targeted to a widespread audience to be implemented in classrooms. The principles of the project are being tested by three teacher educators who have worked with several hundred teacher leaders, and studied a teacher-educator program in Italy that applies a similar method of training. The project has been presented at the 2008 annual AERA conference. AERA’s mission is to explore “scholary inquiry” as it relates to education.

Usefulness: LTP provides that the best way to create a teacher is to put them in the environment and mindset they will experience in the teaching profession. The model of teacher education proposed in the LTP project is one that steps outside of the strict standards that NCATE defines as teacher education. In light of failing schools and inadequate teachers, the need to develop new ways to conceptualize our schools of education is imperative. Despite repeated complaints to NCATE that their standards for teacher programs are outdated, input-based, and restrictive, NCATE’s president, Arthur Wise, maintains that this is the only way to approach accreditation, and the profession of teaching in general. The fact of the matter is that measuring this new way of teaching, LTP in particular, would be very difficult. To measure teacher success in the classroom environment is not objective. As new programs looking to reshape teacher education emerge, accreditation will start to seem moot and ineffective in measuring the quality of learning. 

Works Cited:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.